Extractive Industry · Safety · Accountability · Indigenous Rights · Sustainability
Prototype tool · Rights monitoring
Indigenous Rights Balance
A live five-axis dashboard for tracking how court decisions, UN processes, state measures and institutional shifts move the balance of Indigenous Peoples’ rights.
Indigenous Rights Balance is a live analytical dashboard for tracking developments that strengthen, weaken, bypass or proceduralize Indigenous Peoples’ rights.
It is designed to make changes in the rights environment visible across law, institutions, enforcement, political cost and Indigenous agency.
How to read the dashboard
The dashboard evaluates developments across five axes: norm, institutions, enforcement, political cost and Indigenous agency. It distinguishes events, structural signals and baseline conditions instead of treating every report, court decision or policy document as the same kind of development.
The result is not a scorecard of virtue. It is a way to track movement: where Indigenous rights are strengthened, bypassed, narrowed, proceduralized or made enforceable.
A five-axis dashboard for reading how the world is moving on Indigenous Peoples’
rights — global, regional and by jurisdiction — built from individually assessed
events, not survey scores.
StatusPrototype dataset Last updated: June 2026
Global Balance
—
—
—
Regions
Jurisdictions in this region
Events
The five axes
I
Norm — did the substance of the right itself strengthen? New interpretation of FPIC, land, climate, cultural rights or self-determination can move the norm even with limited enforcement.
II
Institutions — who is now obligated or willing to account for it? A court, a bank, a state, a standard or a UN mechanism. Rights gain force when there is a place to anchor a claim.
III
Enforcement — are there real consequences for violation? Without sanctions, monitoring, grievance mechanisms, funding consequences or access to justice, the balance barely moves.
IV
Political cost — has it become more expensive to ignore Indigenous Peoples? For a state, a bank, an investor, an extractive company or an international body.
V
Indigenous agency — can Indigenous Peoples themselves speak, assemble, travel to UNPFII or EMRIP, file complaints, negotiate, receive funding and avoid arrest? Without this axis, every other right becomes a showcase.
·
A note on silence. Some violations never surface — not because they do not occur, but because no independent press, parliamentary commission, civil litigation route or UN-access channel exists to surface them. This tool treats the absence of an institution capable of generating disclosure as a negative signal on the Institutions axis in its own right, not as missing data to be left blank.